CaseLaw
The appeal before us is against the judgment of the Court of Appeal, Enugu Division delivered on the 14th day of February, 2013 wherein their Lordships of that court in their wisdom dismissed the totality of the appellants' appeal and thereby upheld the judgment of the trial High Court Anambra State in granting the Respondent's claims in part and dismissed the appellants' counter claim.
The genesis of this case was that the Respondent as plaintiff instituted the suit that led to this appeal before the Mbailinofu District of Anambra State Customary Court but subsequently transferred to the High Court upon the order made by Awka Division of Anambra State High Court on 19th February, 1991.
In her amended statement of claim filed on 30th May, 2000, the respondent herein as plaintiff at paragraph 26 sought the following reliefs against the defendants/now appellants.
IN THE ALTERNATIVE, an account of the proceeds of the sale of the family lands and payment over to the plaintiff what is due to her.
N500.00 (Five Hundred Naira) General damages for Trespass."
In their amended statement of Defence filed on 6th February, 2007 the defendants denied the plaintiff's claim and also counter claimed for:
"A declaration that the defendants' father being entitled to the statutory right of occupancy over the piece or parcel of land the subject matter of this suit, the 1st defendant being the 1st son of his late father is now deemed to be entitled to statutory right of occupancy over the same land in accordance with the native law and custom of Awka people."
For purpose of putting the records straight, the claim was originally instituted against the current 2nd appellant and one Anieke Nwogbo as defendants. The second defendant died in the course of the proceedings and was substituted by one Onyibor Anekwe, the 1st appellant herein.
At the trial high court, the respondent testified and called two other witnesses while the 1st appellant and three other witnesses testified for the defendants/appellants.
The trial court gave judgment in favour of the Plaintiff/Respondent and granted the declaration and injunction sought but proceeded to dismiss the Defendants/Appellant's counter claim. On appeal, the lower court dismissed the appeal and re-affirmed the judgment of the trial court. This appeal ensued.
Whether the learned justices of the Court of Appeal were right in upholding...